To classify a patient, a threshold on the Sp score is required an

To classify a patient, a threshold on the Sp score is required and defined as Ts. Patients with a score Sp ≥ Ts are positive; negative otherwise. The list of thresholds tested in the ICBT search must be kept short to limit computation time. Candidate thresholds are selected as local extrema of the ROC curve, computed with pROC [22]. A local extremum is defined as a point of local maximal distance to the diagonal line. To construct the ROC curve we sort the list of biomarker values, resulting in a list of increasing specificity (SP) and decreasing sensitivity (SE). The threshold value Ti is a local extremum if SP[i] ≥ SP[i − 1] and SE[i] ≥ SE[i + 1]. Thresholds that are not local

extrema will not lead to better classification. Usually several thresholds are selected as local extrema Dasatinib price on a ROC curve. The combinatorial

complexity of testing all combinations of biomarkers and threshold values with ICBT can be calculated. Given n biomarkers, and panels with up to m biomarkers, the number C of biomarker combinations to test, is given by: equation(2) C=∑i=1mni=∑i=1mn!i!(n−i)! If there are t thresholds per biomarker, formula this website (3) gives the total number I of threshold combinations to test: equation(3) I=∑i=1mn!i!(n−i)!tiIn addition, all possible Ts from 1 to n − 1 are considered. In a typical setup, one would test combinations of 5 or less out of 10 biomarkers, with 15 thresholds per biomarker. This corresponds to 637 possible biomarker combinations to test. The total number of possible combinations of thresholds and biomarkers comes to 202 409 025, which

is still manageable using current desktop computers. In most real world applications, however, each biomarker will have a different number of thresholds. If T is a vector containing the number of thresholds of all biomarkers in combination j, a more precise estimate is given by: equation(4) I=∑j=1C∏Tj When computational time becomes too long, an additional step is necessary to reduce the number of biomarkers and thresholds. From the N initial Mirabegron biomarkers, P biomarkers are selected (with P < N), each associated with a maximal number of cut-offs (Q). In PanelomiX, random forest [18] and [19] is employed as a multivariate filter [11]. The trees created during the process are analysed to deduce the most frequent biomarkers and thresholds that potentially give the most interesting combinations. We proceed by stepwise elimination. First, a random forest with all the N biomarkers is created. The frequency with which each biomarker appears in tree branches is extracted and the N − 1 biomarkers occurring most often are kept to build the next random forest. These two steps are repeated until the target number of P biomarkers is reached. Finally, a last random forest is computed with P remaining biomarkers to determine the Q thresholds occurring most frequently for each marker.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>