The tendency of the differences is interesting. The modified beam model shows more similar flexible motions with those of the 3-D FE model compared to those of the beam theory model. In the sectional forces, however, the modified beam gives a slightly overestimated result, whereas the beam theory model shows better agreement with the 3-D FE model. In Fig. 20, the modified model shows the time lag in vertical bending moment. These

differences may be due to the inconsistency of the eigenvectors and mass model. this website Fig. 21 and Fig. 22 show the results of nonlinear simulations based on the weakly nonlinear approach. The still water loads are not included. The wave frequency and forward speed condition are chosen for 2nd harmonic springing of

2-node torsion. The 1st and 2nd harmonic components in the 7th mode response show good agreement between the three models. The 8th mode natural frequency of the 3-D FE model is also equal to 3 times the encounter frequency. The 3rd harmonic component is clearly shown in the results of the modified beam and 3-D FE models, whereas it is small in the response of the beam theory MLN0128 manufacturer model. A model test of a virtual 10,000 TEU containership has been carried out by MOERI/KORDI (2010) to investigate springing and whipping phenomena. Fig. 23 shows the experimental model, and Table 8 shows its principle dimensions. The model consists of six segmented hulls, which are connected by an H-shaped backbone. The model is connected with the

towing system by 4 wires, two of which are attached to the AP and the other two are attached to the FP. Farnesyltransferase The measured natural periods of surge, sway and roll motions are 87.29 s, 104.95 s, and 27.42 s in real scale, respectively. Yaw motion is also constrained by the wires, but its natural period is not measured. The segmented body of the experimental model is directly modeled using shell elements in the 3-D FE model. In contrast, a continuous body is assumed in the beam theory model. It makes a difference of the inertial properties between the segmented body and the continuous body. The former corresponds to lumped mass, whereas the latter corresponds to consistent mass. The difference of the inertial properties vanishes if the number of nodes is sufficiently large. In this case, however, the difference will not vanish even in the lowest mode because the experimental model has only six lumped masses. Eigenvalue analysis results are shown in Fig. 24 and Table 9. The lowest flexible mode is 2-node torsion. The difference due to the mass modeling is found in the eigenvectors as expected. The segmented body strongly affects the eigenvectors of torsional mode, which manifest in the form of discontinuous displacement. Moreover, local modes due to lumped mass are found in the result of the 3-D FE model. The local modes are the 13th and 15th modes in Fig. 25. The 2-node horizontal mode is found in the higher modes as shown in Fig.