Results: With left ventricular pressure overload, left ventricular mass and rK(m) increased by 2- and 3-fold, respectively, compared with control, with no change in left ventricular ejection fraction. Left ventricular

myocardial collagen increased approximately 2-fold, which was accompanied by reduced solubility (ie, increased cross-linking) with left ventricular pressure overload, but mRNA expression for fibrillar collagen and matrix metalloproteinases remained relatively unchanged. In contrast, a robust increase in mRNA expression for tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase-1 selleckchem and 4 occurred with left ventricular pressure overload.

Conclusions: In a progressive model of left ventricular pressure overload, which recapitulates the phenotype of aortic stenosis, increased extracellular matrix accumulation and subsequently increased myocardial stiffness were not due to increased fibrillar collagen expression but rather to determinants of post-translational control that included increased collagen stability

(thereby resistant VX-661 to matrix metalloproteinase degradation) and increased endogenous matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Targeting these extracellular matrix post-translational events with left ventricular pressure overload may hold both diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:215-23)”
“In vitro cellular model is an important tool to be used to investigate the cellular events related to pathophysiological conditions in humans. We have developed an in vitro cellular carcinogenesis model of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). In this study, we performed comparative proteomic analysis using 2-DE and LC-tandem mass chromatography to separate and identify differentially expressed proteins. Forty-five proteins were identified, including 24 proteins

with decreased expression and 19 proteins with increased expression during carcinogenesis from immortalized oral epithelial cells to squamous cancerous cells. The identified known proteins Selleck PR-171 were classified into three ontologies of cellular component, molecular function, and biological process. Further validation of five identified proteins (ANXA1, ANXA2, CTSB, KRT17, and S100A6) in the cellular carcinogenesis model and cancerous tissues from OSCC patients confirmed the comparative proteomic results. Moreover, Annexin A1 and A2 expression levels correlated with the pathological differentiation grade of cancerous tissues. Thus, this work provides a dynamic protein file of differentially expressed proteins in oral squamous carcinoma cells, which could provide clues to study the mechanisms of OSCC carcinogenesis and possibly be developed as potential biomarkers for clinical diagnosis or prognostic monitoring.