In both studies, the most frequently reported solicited symptoms

In both studies, the most frequently reported solicited symptoms were pain and fever and grade 3 symptoms occurred infrequently. No safety signals were identified in the present study and none of the SAEs were considered related to vaccination. The most frequently reported unsolicited AEs

were malaria, respiratory tract infections, diarrhoea, and gastroenteritis in all groups. These are common in children of the study age group (Malaria-055). In conclusion, these results confirm that RTS,S/AS01 vaccines formulated from commercial-scale purified antigen bulk lots are produced consistently. Anti-CS antibody BTK inhibitor purchase responses induced were non-inferior to those induced by the batch made from pilot-scale purified antigen bulk lot. The authors would like to thank the children and their families for participating in this trial and the investigators, study nurses and other staff members at the study sites. In particular, we thank Dr. Onyema, Mr. L.O. Otiji, Matron Asiegbu, Matron Ofodile, and Matron Onwubere, Henrietta Nwankwo, Chizoba Eneagu and Sorafenib Helen Ota, Abba Joseph, Julie Yusuf, Patience Kadung, Jimmy Dakie, Jericho Bulus, Ruth Gomper and Samuel Pate, for their contributions to the study at both study sites. The authors thank the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, and Karen Ivinson in particular, for their support of the local study sites. The authors also thank, from GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines,

Lode Schuerman, Pascale Vandoolaeghe, and Marie-Chantal Uwamwezi for reviewing drafts of this manuscript, Didier Lapierre for his contributions to the study design, Florence Richard and Nathalie Annez for their assistance on study operations, Aurélie Olivier and Linda Gibbs for their work on the study protocol, Thomas Moens for writing the study report, Jarno Jansen (Keyrus Biopharma,

on behalf of GSK Vaccines) for publication management, and Joanne Knowles and Sarah Benns (independent medical writers, on behalf of GSK Vaccines) for initial drafting of the manuscript and incorporation of comments received from the authors. Contributors: R.U., S.O., T.O., S.P., E.S., J.-T.O., C.A.D. and D.S. were investigators in this study and were responsible for the recruitment Dipeptidyl peptidase of subjects, collection and assembly of data, and provided interpretation of the results. M.L. and G.C. were responsible for the statistical analyses. E.J. was responsible for lab analysis. M.L. and A.L. designed the study. A.A., E.J. M.L., G.C., O.O.A. and A.L. interpreted the results. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript drafts and approved the final manuscript. Conflict of Libraries interest: Tagbo Oguonu reports receiving a salary from PATH-MVI as an investigator on the study and speaker fees from GlaxoSmithKline outside the work submitted. At the time of study conduct, Abdullahi Ahmad was a WHO/TDR fellow at GlaxoSmithKline vaccines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>