For relative importance, the most highly rated cluster was Personal Ability (cluster average = 4.21). For feasibility to implement, the most highly rated cluster was Sidewalks and Crosswalks (cluster average = 3.66). The Go-Zone map (Fig. 3) compared statement ratings from low to high for both relative

Epacadostat price importance and feasibility to implement. The top right quadrant is the ‘Go-Zone’ for action and reflects statements rated as both important and feasible. Rating scores placed 18 statements within the Go-Zone for action. Twelve of these eighteen statements arose from the sidewalks/crosswalks (n = 7) and neighborhood features (n = 5) clusters. We used a novel approach, concept mapping, to identify elements of the built and social environments that are perceived to influence older adults’ outdoor walking. Our findings are important

for three reasons: older adults command an increasing proportion of the global population (World Health Organization, 2011); decisions regarding neighborhood attributes have implications for older adult mobility; and we reside within an increasingly constrained fiscal environment of public accountability that must prioritize scarce resources. Therefore, our findings are timely and important check details as they guide decision makers regarding priority areas of investment in the built environment that promote mobility of an increasingly aging population. Our findings also highlight areas of enquiry for further research. What emerged as a clear priority for participants was both the presence Adenylyl cyclase and the characteristics of sidewalks and crosswalks. About half of all statements within this cluster were considered both important

and feasible to implement; and this is consistent with the literature related to walking outdoors and older adults’ pedestrian mobility. Safely navigating sidewalks and streets is vital for older adults’ outdoor mobility; and walking is impeded if sidewalks are absent or poorly maintained (Corseuil et al., 2011) or if pedestrian crossing times are too short to allow older adults sufficient time to cross the street (Grant et al., 2010). We deemed statements considered both important and feasible to implement as particularly relevant targets for new or renewed policy efforts. For example, building sidewalks on at least one side of the street was important to participants and is already required for new developments in many major municipalities. Thus, some of our findings reinforce what is already known, validating existing and new policies, and priority areas for investment by local and provincial government. Public transportation and pedestrian routes were also identified as highly important and feasible to implement; and accessible private vehicle parking fell just outside the ‘go-zone’ cut-off.