For a number of questions, GRADE evidence profile and summary of findings tables were constructed, using predefined and rated treatment outcomes, to help achieve consensus for key recommendations and aid transparency of the process. Before final approval by the Writing Group, the guidelines were published online for public consultation and an external peer review was commissioned and conducted. BHIVA views the involvement of patient and community representatives in the guideline development process as essential. The Writing Group included two patient representatives appointed through Alectinib order the UK HIV Community Advisory Board

(UK-CAB) who were involved in all aspects of the guideline development process. In addition, two meetings with patients and community representatives were held to discuss and receive feedback and comments on the proposed guideline recommendations. The first was held before the Writing Group’s consensus meeting and the second as part of the public consultation process. The GRADE Working Group [4] has developed an approach to grading evidence that moves away from initial reliance on study design to consider the overall quality of evidence across outcomes. BHIVA has adopted the modified GRADE system for its guideline development. The advantages of the modified GRADE system are (i) PS341 the grading system provides an informative, transparent summary for clinicians, patients

and policy makers by combining an explicit evaluation of the strength of the recommendation with a judgement of the quality of the evidence for each recommendation, and (ii) the two-level grading system of recommendations has the merit of simplicity

and provides clear direction to patients, clinicians and policy makers. A Grade 1 recommendation is a strong recommendation to do (or not do) something, where the benefits clearly outweigh the risks (or vice versa) for most, if not all patients. Etofibrate Most clinicians and patients should and would want to follow a strong recommendation unless there is a clear rationale for an alternative approach. A strong recommendation usually starts with the standard wording ‘We recommend’. A Grade 2 recommendation is a weaker or conditional recommendation, where the risks and benefits are more closely balanced or are more uncertain. Most clinicians and patients would want to follow a weak or conditional recommendation but many would not. Alternative approaches or strategies may be reasonable depending on the individual patient’s circumstances, preferences and values. A weak or conditional recommendation usually starts with the standard wording ‘We suggest’. The strength of a recommendation is determined not only by the quality of evidence for defined outcomes but also the balance between desirable and undesirable effects of a treatment or intervention, differences in values and preferences and, where appropriate, resource use.