2010). Our results were consistent with those of Gantar et al. (2008), who found that the interactive effects between strains of Cyanobacteria and green algae depended both on the concentration of allelopathic compounds and on the time of exposure. We also observed the effects of enriched cell-free filtrates from one microalgal species on the growth of the other microalgal species at the initial cell densities 1.0 × 104 and 1.0 × 105 cells mL− 1 (Figure 2). It was evident that the growth selleck of P. donghaiense with initial cell densities of 1.0 × 104 cells mL− 1 was significantly inhibited by the filtrates from P. tricornutum cultures from LGS onwards (P < 0.0001). In contrast, when the initial cell

density of P. donghaiense was 1.0 × 105 cells mL− 1, the enriched filtrates of P. tricornutum promoted the growth of P. donghaiense at LGS and EGS (P < 0.05), after which a significant inhibitory effect manifested itself at SGS (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the growth of P. tricornutum at both 1.0 × 104 and 1.0 × 105 cells mL− 1 was inhibited in the presence of cell-free filtrates from P. donghaiense (P < 0.0001). In the present study, besides the co-culture method, we also applied the cell-free filtrate method to assess the allelopathic interactions between P.

donghaiense and the diatom P. tricornutum. These methods, as expected, produced some identical results. In general, growth inhibition of one species was recorded in both the co-culture experiment and the enriched filtrate experiment, indicating PD0332991 ic50 that the allelopathic effects

of one species were acting on the other one. However, the extent of interference in the coculture experiment was not quite identical with that in the enriched filtrate experiment. The degree of growth inhibition and promotion response of P. donghaiense and P. tricornutum cells was different in the coculture experiment and enriched filtrate experiment. This indicated that the allelopathic substances of P. tricornutum acting on P. donghaiense were probably different in their chemical nature or could have reacted antagonistically/synergistically in the co-culture ( Yamasaki et al. 2007). An et al. (1996) assumed that the effect of the allelochemical pool of a plant might be characterised by two processes: the release and degradation of the allelochemicals. Note Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II that in our co-culture and filtrate experiments, the mode of allelopathy was different. Microalgal cells could rapidly and continuously release biologically-active allelochemicals into the culture medium in the co-culture, and this was also a result of the synergistic interaction of two or more compounds, some of which could have been degraded or lost in the filtrate experiment. Moreover, cell-to-cell contact in the co-culture was also responsible for the non-identical growth response of microalgal cells in the two methods. Nagasoe et al. (2006) found that the growth inhibition of Gyrodinium instriatum by Skeletonema costatum might require cell contact, but that G.