(17.5%) [5]. This can most likely be explained by a potential selection bias due to small patient numbers in these studies. The numerically decreasing prevalence of left dominance and codominant coronary dominance indicates a worse prognosis accompanying these variants. We hypothesized

that one explanation could be the larger myocardial area at risk in case of an acute myocardial infarction, especially in cases with left main stem involvement. Infarct size has been identified as a predictor for worse outcomes [10]. Other possible mechanisms explaining a worse prognosis might be coronary artery length and lumen diameter. It has been described that patients with a smaller lumen diameter of the RCA are prone to right ventricular ischemia [11]. We were not able to measure the diameter of the arteries in relation to coronary dominance. We hypothesize that patients with smaller-diameter HIF cancer LCX are prone to left ventricular ischemia in case of left dominance. It has also been observed that the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is longer and more frequently wraps around the apex in cases of left coronary dominance compared with right coronary dominance [12]. If this is also true for balanced systems, this could lead to an increased selleck screening library myocardial area at risk in case of a left

dominant or balanced system in a patient with a stenosis in the LAD. Myocardial bridging, in which a segment of an epicardial artery is covered by myocardium [13], appears to be more common in hearts with left coronary dominance. Potential clinical implications of myocardial bridging may vary from protection against atherosclerosis to systolic vessel compression and subsequent exercise-related myocardial ischemia. Therefore, the combined role of myocardial bridging and coronary dominance for the prognosis of the patients is difficult to elucidate. Finally, the relation between severity of CAD and coronary dominance has been studied. It was shown that patients with a right dominant system have a

slightly higher tendency toward three-vessel disease compared with the left-dominant patients [6]. These results could potentially weaken the relation between the left dominant and balanced systems and worse prognosis. However, this relation Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase might be more complicated because, with left dominance, the left ventricle and a part of the right ventricle are supplied by the left coronary artery. Thus, atherosclerotic disease of the left coronary artery may be considered equivalent to three-vessel disease. We note that this relation requires confirmation in another cohort. Several limitations of our analysis deserve mention. First, although autopsy is routinely performed in our center, permission from relatives is required. This could potentially lead to selection bias. Second, the exclusion of nonevaluable coronary angiographs could have resulted in bias if one of the dominance variants is associated with more severe atherosclerosis.