12 This naturalistic study suggests that impaired memory for the traumatic event reduces the risk for PTSD. Repressive coping style and PTSD A repressive coping style is a cognitive and emotional strategy aimed at ignoring or diverting attention from a threat13 and, in a way, could mimic amnesia. If the hypothesis is that amnesia for traumatic events reduces the rate of

PTSD, we would expect #AZD4547 keyword# that individuals with repressive coping styles would be less vulnerable to developing PTSD. Indeed, in a study of prevalence of PTSD after MI,“ it was found that in individuals with repressive coping style the prevalence of PTSD was Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical lower (7.1%), as compared with individuals with low

anxiety (20%), high anxiety (19.4%) or defensive coping style (17.2%) – Table I. Table I. Repressive coping style. PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder. Adapted from ref 14: Ginzburg K, Solomon Z, Bleich A. Repressive coping style, acute stress disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder after myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:748-757. … Actually, the possibility that repressive coping style could be an adaptive way of dealing with trauma has been known for Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical close to 30 years.15 This observation was described as follows: “Avoidance, suppression, and denial (avoiding coping strategies) are effective in reducing traumatic stress-induced distress.” Debriefing and spontaneous remission If a reduction in fear memory associated with the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical trauma is beneficial, then psychological

interventions which enhance memories of the trauma, eg, debriefing, would interfere with the potent beneficial spontaneous recovery. In a study of psychological debriefing for road traffic accident victims,16 Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical it was found in a follow-up 4 months and 3 years after the accident, that a subset of individuals – those who experienced high anxiety after the accident and received debriefing – were doing significantlyworse new (as measured by Impact of Event Score), 4 months and 3 years later, as compared with those who did not receive the debriefing. That is, the expected and welcome spontaneous recovery process was hampered by this intervention, which is associated with enhancing memories of the traumatic event. Other studies17-20 also reported similar findings, and a meta-analysis21 also supported the caution that one should exercise in indiscriminate utilization of single-session debriefing.