“
“Objective: CUDC-907 solubility dmso The SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) is a general instrument used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL). The purpose of this study is to describe self-reported information on health and the quality of life among cancer outpatients during chemotherapy treatment and to compare it with the baseline sample drawn from the general Spanish population.
Methods: A randomised sample of 583 cancer outpatients completed the questionnaire. Using a cross-sectional analysis of the SF-36 data, standardised scores were used to compare patients with comparative
Spanish baseline data. Other health-related concerns (gender, age, site of cancer) were also analysed.
Results: The patients showed acceptable levels on HRQL and no significant differences were found between the oncology patients compared with the general population for any of the SF-36 domains. The older patients had scores significantly lower in physical functioning (p < 0.01) and physical role
(p<0.05). The results identified lower HRQL ratings among women compared with men on all the scales except general health. In relation to the location of the cancer, patients with genitourinary tumours scored statistically lower (P<0.05) on bodily pain in the SF-36 domain compared with patients with gastrointestinal tumours.
Conclusions: Although more studies are needed, the SF-36 allows us to describe the HRQL of cancer outpatients during chemotherapy treatment compared with the general population. Copyright (C) 2009 John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.”
“Objective: HD203 is a biosimilar of etanercept, a fusion protein of the ligand-binding portion of the human tumor necrosis factor Selleck Mizoribine receptor Il linked to the Fe portion of human immunoglobulin G1. Since HD203 is under clinical development, this study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of HD203 with Enbrel (R), the first marketed etanercept.
Methods: A double-blind, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study was conducted in 37 healthy volunteers. In each period, 25 mg/mL of reconstituted lyophilized reference (Enbrel (R)) or test product (HD203) was administered subcutaneously, either the reference product followed by the test product, or vice versa. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken for 480 hours after dosing, and serum concentrations of the products were LB-100 price determined using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals for the maximum concentration (C-max) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC(0-t)) were estimated.
Results: A total of 35 subjects completed the study; serious adverse events were not observed. The mean serum concentration-time profiles of the two products were similar. The C-max and AUC(0-t) values of the reference product (mean +/- standard deviation) were 1.25 +/- 0.45 mg/L and 283.15 +/- 98.